The WRIGHT to destroy a candidate
Quote from Rev. Wright:
"..(Obama) says what he has to say as a politician.."
(Hmmm. That sounds like a hidden agenda. Doesn't it.?)
I wonder what else Obama has been saying that may not necessarily be true? Things he is saying, "just because he is a politician?"
Obama had this to say: "When it came time to stand up against the oil companies, to stand against Dick Cheney's energy bill, my opponent voted for it and I voted against it," Obama said. And he continued- "And that bill had billions of dollars in giveaways to the oil companies. It was the best bill that the energy companies could buy."
Actually, the bill that Obama voted against RAISED taxes on the oil companies by 300 million over a period of years.
You have, of course, heard that Obama is against removing the federal gas tax for this summer. McCain is for it. Rush Limbaugh has been suggesting it for some time now. Even Hillary might sign on to it. Many in congress think it is a great "short term" idea. Removing the federal tax from gas could really help Americans over the 3 summer months.
Let's back up and review this information…
Obama voted against the 2005-energy bill that would raise taxes on oil companies.
Obama is against cutting the federal gas tax this summer to help poor Americans pay for high fuel costs.
This doesn't sound like a guy who has "the peoples" interests in mind?
Obama claims he is the only candidate running who doesn't except money from oil companies. "..Obama, it is against the law for ANY candidate to except money from oil companies.." Besides, Obama has received money from people who work for oil companies. The same as Hillary and McCain; donations in the legal amount.
So, why does Obama say these things..?? But the bigger question might be… Why do people believe him and trust what he is saying as the truth..?? Because they have to.
Liberals are so invested in Obama, there is no turning back now. They finally, after YEARS of listening to how bad the Clinton's were, now believe us on that. These folks feel they can't vote republican. They have no choice. They must defend Obama no matter what the guy says or does.
This is why I am so glad that I am a conservative. We can openly talk about our candidate. We can point out his good points and bad. We do not have to hide or cover up the weakness McCain has.
On the left, they spent years trying to pretend that some "right wing political machine" brought on all the problems that the Clinton's had. But only now are they seeing what the Clinton's are really like.
For people on the left, they cannot ask questions about Obama. Like baby birds, these liberals would be kicked out of the nest if they asked tough questions of Obama. YOU CAN'T DO THAT..!!
For if you dare challenge Obama. You are not liberal. You are a racist.
You folks on the left have no free speech. How easily, you folks on the left, give up free speech- scares me!
Here on the right side, I could one day ask readers: "What's so bad about John McCain? Let's look at President Reagan's record.."
I can write an editorial like that, when McCain IS NOT POPULAR, and no one kicks me out of the conservative movement. The next week I could spend time talking about how McCain pisses me off.
Here on the right; I could challenge global warming. Or I could enter the movement to voice my side of it like Newt Gingrich.
Conservatives can debate topics like "Darwinism."
You will find nothing like that on the left. You MUST comply FULLY on every idea that the left has adopted, or you do not belong. There is no debate.
We have free speech here on the "right side." We can talk about anything.
On the liberal front, with blinders firmly in place: "Don't you dare ask Obama any of those tough questions.." Obama is above all those stupid questions like: What he voted on- Obama voted to suspend the Illinois state gas tax, but Obama doesn't want to suspend the federal gas tax..??
Don't ask Obama about past friends...
Don't ask Obama about his Reverend...
Just sit there with your blinders on and do not speak.
(Chanting "Obama, Obama" is acceptable. But only if Obama is NOT speaking.)
Well, at least you will not have to BUY a new pair of blinders to shade you from the Obama truths. You can use the same blinders that you wore for years with the Clinton's.
With Obama appearing on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace later today, you folks on the left might need a blindfold and ear plugs. (Or better yet, just blame republicans for anything said by Obama. That always works for you guys.)
I thought democrats were not going to appear on Fox News..?? What happened..??
Maybe, in the middle of all this mess, the Reverend Wright explained Obama better than anyone else has:
"..(Obama) says what he has to say as a politician.."
Yes…
Obama is NOT a God.
Obama is human.
And if Obama is human, we can beat him.
You folks on the left need to deal with Rev Wright. He is the one man that will destroy Obama.
Maybe giving Wright a million-dollar mansion and 10 million in cash WASN'T ENOUGH.
You might have to dig deeper into the wallet. He likes the spotlight.
(And I like Rev Wright in the spotlight..!!)
See.. again.. People on the right enjoy free speech. Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republican
14 comments on The WRIGHT to destroy a candidate
Add a comment
To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster
Interesting article. I do think you were on regarding liberals sticking by Obama no matter what and I do think the lefties are so imbedded with leftness that even if a republican candidate is the best choice for President, they would not vote for that person simply because they are republican and that scares me.
Yea, when you have a person like Ann Coulter say she would vote for Hillary because Hillary would be tougher than McCain on some issues, that tells us something.
You can have Jenna Bush say she isn't sure who she will vote for.
That is political freedom.
I'm not hearing this kind of freedom from the left.
(At least, not in public.) In private, many liberals are fed up with both Obama and Hillary.
I think John McCain is a good man and I would like very much to hear a debate on the issues between Obama and McCain AND then between Hillary and McCain. I think only that way would be be able to get past personal digs and make a decision on what is best ofr the Nation.
He would be better if he could tell the difference between Al Qaeda, Sunni and Shiites and knew something (anything) about economics.
That is a hell of a good idea you have there..!!
A debate between Hillary and McCain. Plus, a debate between Obama and McCain.
I would like to see that.
However, it wouldn't benifit McCain in any way. So, it would never happen. The best thing for republicans right now is to let the democrats continue to step on each others feet.
But, none the less, a great idea..!!
More about Wright...LOL. Yawn.
Keep beating that dead horse. Funny how you claim free speech when you refuse to discuss in Article Hagee, Robertson and Rod Parsley. But then again, their statements show McCain as the flip-flopping shell of a man that he is.
I have talked about how McCain could be a great president, and I have talked about how McCain could screw up the conservative movement.
(This is something that YOU cannot do with Obama. You MUST never utter a single negative word about Obama. For surely, you will be drummed out of the progressive movement. Like readers of The Daily Kos, or life long democrat George Stephanopolis(?)
NEVER SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT OBAMA.
As far as Hagee, it is really a non-issue. That is why no major news outlet is covering the Hagee story. That is why progressive bloggers must carry that water for Prince Obama.
A top Hamas leader indorses Barack Obama. He said Obama would make a great US President. You do not hear me making a big deal about that. Because people are not responsible for who indorses them.
However, making a conscience effort to attend a church for 20 years to listen to a racist preacher, is another matter.
I know you want Wright to be a "dead horse." But that horse is alive and kicking. (On ABC News, and PBS just this past week.)
You must have me confused with someone else, because I have been critical of things about Obama, and as I said to Whereabouts, he is the lesser of the evils, With Hillary a distant second, and McCain WAY behind.
Stephanopolis has been a sell out for years, well before this campaign started.LOL
Why is it that when someone endorses a democratic candidate, you try and merge their morality, but when they endorse your candidate, you ignore it? Its not that they are ignoring McCains because they are "not news", a famous man calling the Catholic Church the great wh0re is news. Its really about who will kiss the @ss of the corporate leaders, and the one candidate that is least likely (but I won't at this point say exempt) from doing so is Obama. McCain (or McSame) is a continuation of Bush's failed policies, Hillary is married to the man who signed NAFTA into law, so corporations know they can get their way with them.
Well, EKY.
Words mean very little when actions speak louder.
You say that you have disagreed with Obama But on my post, you are the only one defending him. Here is your opportunity to prove me wrong and tell me all the things you do not like about Obama.
Hagee indorses McCain. Hamas indorses Obama.
Let's see…
Hamas kills people because of their skin color, religion, and for being gay.
Hagge said stupid things.
I'm not sure that you will want to hold on to that argument when Obama faces republicans this fall.
Obama made a effort to attend that church for 20 years. I only needed to listen to one hour of the Rev. Wright's sermons to understand the race baiting and racist content within. Middle America, the people who actually vote for these candidates, will not take to kindly to much of his remarks.
And Obama walked in there of his own free will.
If President Bush attended the "skull and bones" society, or Bush attended "White Power" rallies, you are saying that YOU wouldn't report that..??
Come on EKY, I know you guys. You would be all over that stuff in a second.
Sweeping Rev. Wright, and Rezko, and Ayers under the rug MIGHT work with Hillary. McCain will not bring that stuff up. (But he doesn't have to.)
Obama has a tough road ahead of him.
(And he doesn't want to debate Hillary anymore.)
You know you missed me.
I think your main point - that liberals have no free speech because they can't say anything that contradicts the liberal mindset - now has some excellent examples.
"Hagee indorses McCain. Hamas indorses Obama.
Let's see…
Hamas kills people because of their skin color, religion, and for being gay.
Hagge said stupid things."
And the difference really is this, McCain Endorses, and seeked the endorsement of Hagee, Obama did not seek the endorsement of Hamas, and has publicly said he would not talk to them.
Sure, I have actually discussed Bush (and Kerry's) Skull and Bones connections in the past. They are not exactly secrets.
What don't I like about Obama: The contributions he has received from Nuclear power agencies, the fact that I believe he isn't wanting to do Enough to fix health care (cost and insurance issues is only one problem with our system, I see more "delivery of care" issues that no one is really addressing), I didn't see him backing Dodd as well as I though he should have against the Telecom immunity issues, and I have yet to hear him say he wants to investigate fully this current administration for it's war crimes related to torture and the invasion of Iraq. In other words, he isn't a "strong enough" progressive for me.